from: le_haim date: Feb. 24, 2014 - 6:51 pm #

Newest Members imovie Archived Rules <note! Use the headlines! [Thermostat] imovie [#] [mole] [#] [amazeme] [#] [le_haim] [#] [di_wine] [#] [sursurs] [#] [kisswithafist] [#] [entry] [#] [Pork ] [#] [diary] [#] [Fish] [#] and tags! (Tags) used tags Community Rules Post your question in the commune Specialty: NEED! Where to buy? Translate!
from: le_haim date: Feb. 24, 2014 - 6:51 pm #
from: kisswithafist date: Feb. 24, 2014 - 7:29 pm #
This is a one-sided view. Which is easily accessible, it loses its value - a single piece of one that could listen to for months has become something of what once heard and deletes. Is downloading imovie and nenoklausās imovie all. In other words, the flavor imovie is lost. If this is not persuaded you, then remember that behind every composition is a thorough musician's work - work which invested an enormous effort and time. Think that these "live from each other, rather than from food products"? Reply | Previous | Discussion
A composition value (ie, information) does not change depending on availability. Piece of music that are available on pirate bay contains exactly imovie the same information as a piece of music, which I purchased from the "Žīdrekords" record label. Your "taste" factor, in turn, has a subjective value. If someone can not handle (focus on processing) information, then the problem is the user, not the employer or carrier side. For the music effortlessly - as if they survived, when recording technology was not available as such? Music is a wonderful opportunity to give concerts in person, in return for some sort of money. Reply | Previous | Discussion
You are now accused of human perception, in that it is directly dependent on the individual's will - the majority of the public is devalvējusies music and not on any objective value is no longer here it comes - no one thinks about it. By the way, the value of a work of art in a broad sense at all is debatable, but I'm talking about how real people are currently receiving. Before the recordings was printing notes. Of course, that both records and notes can be reproduced. But not in such quantities as the internet. And why should only have to put up with the income of the concerts? I do not want to pretend to be better than I am - I use the same thing or the same youtube, but if something I really imovie like, and then I buy. Reply | Previous | Discussion imovie
Well here, so the problem is with music reception. In other words - people are stupid. Nobody does not prevent you donate a musician who you liking. Also, I'm doing it, as far as possible, try to bypass the whole mountain with intermediaries. If proceeds of the concerts is enough to continue to exist and continue to create music, then - why not? Or kapitaļizms over everything and give happiness than those who are able to pay for it? Reply | Previous | Discussion
The moderation of capitalism over the part. If set, concert attendance in the last decades of gradually decreasing. Do not know how in other areas, but academic music have either točno. Can it be tightened along with the music free for all - that I find it hard to judge. Reply | Previous
either when you pressed for money, go and buy their music, the Internet is not for it, so I give my money on things that are available for free! and no musical taste factors imovie here does not work! Reply | Previous
Yes, it is a thought!